ADAMH Suffers

 

Up

ADAMH suffers under cuts

By TAMARIA L. LIDDELL
The Eagle-Gazette Staff; tliddell@nncogannett.com

Getting the word out about the loss of services for those suffering from mental health, drug addiction and alcohol problems is becoming an increasingly critical issue in Fairfield County.

"There are a number of people in the community with serious mental health, drug and alcohol problems that we can't provide appropriate services to," said Orman Hall, executive director of the county's Alcohol, Drug Addiction and Mental Health Services Board. "Not being able to provide these services, could cost some lives in the future and mean a number of people will have diminished lives and not be able to live the quality of life they should."

With Medicaid costs rising and no way to alleviate those costs -- meaning they must be paid -- other areas are taking a backseat, with some programs being eliminated.

"Our agencies have good services but people are suffering, because important services that we should have, we don't," Hall said.

Three percent of the county's population receive services from the board's six contracting agencies, New Horizons, The Recovery Center, Fairfield Medical Center, The Lighthouse, Mid-Ohio Psychological Services and the Fairfield Mental Health Consumer Group.

The board, whose budget is projected at $5.9 million, has made more than $600,000 in cuts since the levy failure in last November's general election.

Reductions made between fiscal year 2003 through fiscal year 2004, directly affect the contracting agencies, who in turn reduced their budgets in numerous ways.

"We account for 70 percent of all of our contracting agencies' budgets," Hall said.

Cuts made were: New Horizons, $312,926; The Recovery Center, $143,954; The Lighthouse, $17,124; Mid-Ohio Psychological Services, $36,744; and The Fairfield Mental Health Consumer Group, $46,387.

Besides cuts to its contracting agencies, the board also reduced their office budget by $68,361, which includes temporarily reducing one staff position and freezing employee salaries.

"I think we're close to having a balanced budget," Hall said. "Expenditures were increasing at such a rapid rate that we had to use our operating reserves."

This has in turn depleted the operating reserves significantly.

Revenues have varied from $20,000 to $1 million a month, depending on levy and state money or Medicaid settlements.

The board's expenditures are typically $500,000 to $600,000 a month.

"We're pretty confident we won't spend more money than we have this year, because of a cash flow problem," Hall said. "When we had reserves, we could pay the bill on time. It will be a little tighter now. But if we have increases in Medicaid this year, we'll have to make additional cuts. We're hoping we'll see some of the increases level out in the near distant future."

The board's contracting agencies billed $3,629,862 in Medicaid in fiscal year 2003, up 23.7 percent from $2,934,766 in FY 2002. The increase between FY 2000 and FY 2003 was 54.3 percent.

If Medicaid patterns continue, there will be additional cuts.

"If you look at our overall Medicaid expenditures, they have grown tremendously and we have no ability to control it," Hall said. "It will depend upon Medicaid trends and what happens to state and federal funds. If billing trends continue, we'll have to make additional cuts and all of our providers know that."

In the meantime, the board is gearing up to do all they can to educate the community and try to pass a replacement levy in 2005. This is very essential, Hall said.

"Because we have such a small levy, we can't provide services at the same level that most other counties can," he said. "We're already cutting back on non-Medicaid services. This puts us in a double bind that most counties aren't experiencing and is making our existing mental health system less adequate than it is.

"What we're going to attempt to do in these next two years is educate the community about why these issues are so important and try to pass a replacement levy," he said.

In November's general election, the board tried to pass a new levy, but was defeated. Issue 15, a 1-mill levy, would've cost the owner of a $100,000 home $30.62 a year of $2.55 a month.

The board renewed their existing levy, a 0.75-mill levy in 1986 and 1996. Going for another renewal levy would continue to put the board in the same situation it's in now.

"If we can pass a replacement levy, it will generate substantial revenue," Hall said.

A replacement levy can be sought, when the existing levy is three elections away from expiration.

It's very difficult to pass a new levy, Hall said.

Statistical data from the Ohio Association of County Behavioral Health Authorities show that between 1993 and 2002, only 2 new levies passed and the other 49 new levy attempts failed in the state. During that same time, 27 replacement levies were passed and 10 replacement levies failed.

Running a successful campaign will include a lot of door to door, personal contact.

"We're going to spend a lot of time developing a volunteer base to get this word out and that's going to take some time to do," Hall said.

Until then, finding additional means to stay afloat remains constant.

"We need to get creative about looking for revenue to finance mental health and drug and alcohol services," Hall said. "Property taxes don't equally affect all people in our county. ADAMH boards need to have a broader range of local income opportunities than we do now."

Originally published Monday, August 11, 2003